The music industry made up of several record labels is often given a “bad rap”. No, they do not force our children to listen to the negative music. However, they are guilty of flooding the market with the same types of music and turning a deaf ear to any music that does not fit into their profit margin.
So, you do not want to buy The music industry has always done this, but even more so now that their profits are decreasing due to the popularity of online websites who offer a large library of music not only from the artists we are familiar, but new artists who have not been able to break through the industry Music labels are not for the music that does not promote their interest off the radio stations by making sure that the music that is in their interest is played in rotation – what kind of deals do they make? Is it payola? Not sure – The fact remains that only certain music selections are on the air – and we keep listening and buying the same song, different artist – just like the music labels want us to do djpunjab.com.
The Pimp Factor
Recording labels have also been known to contract with an artist, so that they have the right to their music – and then refuse to promote it – why? To control what you and I listen to on .radio and keep the type of music that they want to promote in the forefront. In any other area this action would be considered as “pimping”. This is a harsh term – but what is a Pimp? According to the website EduQna “What Does Pimping My Ride Mean?”, The explanation fits pretty well “‘Pimp my Ride’ ‘is a phrase meaning the modification of (something), usually, unrealistic but very flashy way (think pimp-like (making) modifications, etc. (something being) altered to achieve the appearance (“something more media than real”). I really love EduQna’s Rough translation: “Please, if you would like to pull me from my pockets to make my possession for compensation.” If the word fits, the recording labels should wear. Many artists have complained that they feel “pimped out” due to the types of contracts they innocently sign just to break in the industry – the sign is innocent, but the wording of the contract is by design – to control the music and the artist who creates it
The music industry is really shooting itself in the foot and hemorrhaging slowly by not joining with online music sites whereby both can profit. However, in its effort to control the industry as it has in the past, they are missing out on a large variety of music to their demographic target – 13 to 18 year old listeners. But those listeners are growing up and due to their computer and internet capabilities, they are “hacking” in an online market of music that the mainstream music industry can not touch – Online Streaming Music.
Gently Down the (Music) Stream
In 1999, an 18-year-old college dropout named Shawn Fanning changed the music exchange forever with his file-sharing program called Napster. His idea (not the 60 hours of making the computer code it took to create it) was simple: a computer program that allowed computer users to share and swap files, specifically music, through a centralized file server. His response to the complaints of the problem was that he would not be able to do the same. messaging Napster was born But was Shawn patted on the back for his ingenuity? Are you kidding? The Recording Industry Association of America filed suit against Napster charging them with tributary copyright infringement, which means Napster was not guilty of copyright but also contributing to and facilitating other people’s infringement. However, Napster argued with some success that because the real files are never in Napster’s possession, but transferred from user to user, that Napster is not illegal illegal. The issue in P2P applications (Peer to Peer) is that if Napster is guilty of copyright infringement, then the consumers of Napster are also guilty Likewise, if the consumers are not guilty, then how can Napster be held responsible?